Just found an article that seems to bring a whoooole new aspect to the vexed and often ridiculous ‘global warming’ debate.
Here’s the link..
And here’s some edited highlights…
“Global Warming” is, and always was, a policy for genocidal reduction of the world’s population. The preposterous claim that human-produced carbon dioxide will broil the Earth, melt the ice caps, and destroy human life, came out of a 1975 conference in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, organized by the influential anthropologist Margaret Mead, president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), in 1974.
Mead—whose 1928 book on the sex life of South Pacific Islanders was later found to be a fraud—recruited like-minded anti-population hoaxsters to the cause: Sow enough fear of man- caused climate change to force global cutbacks in industrial activity and halt Third World development. Mead’s leading recruits at the 1975 conference were climate scare artist Stephen Schneider, population-freak biologist George Woodwell, and the current AAAS president John Holdren—all three of them disciples of Malthusian fanatic Paul Ehrlich, author of The Population Bomb.1 Guided by luminaries like these, conference discussion focussed on the absurd choice of either feeding people or “saving the environment.”…
The North Carolina conference, which took place Oct. 26-29, 1975, was co- sponsored by two agencies of the U.S. National Institutes of Health: the John E. Fogarty International Center for Advanced Study in the Health Sciences and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. (Mead had been a Scholar in Residence at the Fogarty Center in 1973.)
It was at this government- sponsored conference, 32 years ago, that virtually every scare scenario in today’s climate hoax took root. Scientists were charged with coming up with the “science” to back up the scares, so that definitive action could be taken by policy-makers.
Global cooling—the coming of an ice age—had been in the headlines in the 1970s, but it could not easily be used to sell genocide by getting the citizens of industrial nations to cut back on consumption. Something more drastic and more personal was needed.
Eugenics and The Paradigm Shift
Mead’s population-control policy was firmly based in the post-Hitler eugenics movement, which took on the more palatable names of “conservation” and “environmentalism” in the post-World War II period. As Julian Huxley, the vice president of Britain’s Eugenics Society (1937-1944), had announced in 1946, “even though it is quite true that radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.” Huxley was then director-general of the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
You just have to hope this is conspiracy-theory garbage don’t you. But I have a suspicion it’s possibly not. As I said in an earlier post, Global Warming, or Climate Change, or AGW, to give it the more fancy name, has always been a very weird ‘minority cause’. And I speak as a former member of CND, which never, ever in its history managed to get the weight of credible media behind it that Global Warming can. CND – a real persecuted minority – only appeared in the media to be denigrated or subtly mocked. Its public profile was a mix of befuddled do-gooder and crazed Leftie Traitor. CND never got sympathetic op-eds and editorials in the New York Times, or documentaries made about it by ex-Vice Presidents.
It never had half its budget paid by the US State Department either.
And yet this latest Minority Cause is getting all that and more. Even to the point of the US Government funding the IPCC to the tune of $19000000, and being kinda shy about admitting it too.
Can the article above offer a possible explanation for this? After all when Julian Huxley made his chilling prediction about having to make ‘the unthinkable thinkable’ he was Director General of UNESCO, which is, of course, part of the United Nations. Which of course is presently the heart and soul of the Global Warming movement.
So, is this the plan – terrify the masses into believing the world is about to boil. Suppress all contrary opinion. Persecute those who try and reassure that things are ok. Make people so bludgeoned and bewildered by a fake ‘consensus’ of science and politics that they lose all critical faculties, and then, when they’re frightened beyond reason, offer them a ‘solution’.
“It’s ok. There’s still hope. All we need to do is let a few billion people die and the rest of us will be saved. All we need to do is turn out the lights, shut off the power, stop growing food for any but the elite, let all that useless brown and yellow and black and white trash human surplus be sloughed off – and lo! A new day will dawn. The ark of mankind will find the distant shore. We will be leaner, fitter, cleaner, blonder…“
Is that what’s going on? Huxley would probably approve. It’s a great solution to the problem of persuading decent people to allow indecent things to be done in their name.
A ‘final solution’ if you will.